About Me

Name:Arnie
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Islam demands Airport remodel restroom.

Oh my, another step taken in the Islamic play book of how to take over the United States without firing a shot.

"The Kansas City International Airport has added several foot-washing basins in restrooms to accommodate a growing number of Muslim taxicab drivers who requested the facilities to prepare for daily Islamic prayer," at the request of CAIR.

The airport authorities do not want to talk about it, and when asked how much it cost for the remodeling project of accommodation, a spokesperson said it could not be broken down.  Read the article here.

There is more to this story than just installing foot washing stalls.

Why did the airport cave in to the Muslims?  Did CAIR threaten with a huge lawsuit?  Does a CAIR official have some dirt on an airport official?  Why should special facilities be made available to Muslims at the airports, and not at the cab company who the Muslims work for.  Does the cab companies have foot washing stalls installed in their restrooms? 

Folks, when will American officials get the idea that they must stand up against these 'special accommodations' for Muslims only, and tell these groups to take a hike.  Don't hold your breath.  Americans have become wimps.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If it was submitted to Hollywood, it would have been OK

An 18 year old Marine applicant has been discharged from the marines for writing a violent essay for a creative writing class in high school, that in all probability, if the essay had been submitted to a Hollywood studio for a TV production it would have been accepted as normal creative work.  He has been arrested, although he is an honor student and has a clean record.

"Asked to write about whatever he wanted in a creative writing class, would-be Marine and honors student Lee, 18, described a violent dream in which he shot people and then "had sex with the dead bodies.''    Read the article.
And then read his essay.

Sure, most of us would consider the subject sick writing for a high school student.  But do we consider it a sick subject if a 32 year old entertainment script writer produces stuff like that for a TV broadcast?   If the creative writer had graduated from high school, would it have been OK?   No, as in the V-Tech case, Cho was writing similar violent stuff, so you must graduate from college first, then you can go to Hollywood. and let your imagination and creative writing skills out.  

To make matters worse the writing also "alarmed" the first year teacher.  Oh my.

No wonder our kids are confused. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This bill, a terrorist cannot buy a gun, except.

Only a democrat with the endorsement of the Justice Department, could think up such a plan, and it took two years of a study to come up with the idea.   The bill, introduced by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J,  intends to restrict a gun sale to a suspected terrorist, one who is on the FBI watch list.   Except, if they determine it would hinder the investigation of the suspect as a terrorist, then he could by the gun.  Except, if the would be buyer appealed the blocked sale.   Link.

And this is what Senator Lautenburg had to say about this bill.  "The administration finally realized that letting terrorists buy guns is dangerous," Lautenberg said. "This 'terror' gap in our gun laws has been open too long."

Do you feel safer now that terrorist cannot buy guns in the US? 

So, let me get this right.  The bill prohibits a terrorist from buying a gun except if he really wants one.
The bill prohibits a terrorist from buying a gun except if the FBI knows he is a terrorist, but does not want the terrorist to know that it knows he is a terrorist. 

And it took two years of intensive study to think it up.  How many years has Al Gore been studying global climate change?  The climate is getting warmer, except for those cooler days. 

Oh. and It's OK to tell the terrorists when we plan to leave Iraq and bring all of our soldiers home.  It's also OK to let suspected terrorist look a likes skip the security shake down at airports because we do not want to get caught profiling.  It's also OK to let terrorists slip through the southern border because the Border Patrol might violate their civil rights by stopping them from crossing the border.

Do you feel safer with a Democratic controlled Congress?    Will you feel much safer with a Democrat President AND a democrat controlled Congress?  



Foolishness is born in the heart of a child, and some grown men do not want to let go of familiar traits.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Food Stamp Challenge.

So the people of Oregon are encouraged to, and the Governor and his wife are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge.  Gov. Ted Kulongoski and his wife will each have $21 for the week to use to buy the food they will consume during the week.  The purpose is to bring awareness of just how hard it is for anyone to survive with only $3.00 a day available to purchase the food they need for survival.   Impossible.  Could you live on that amount?

The Main purpose is to raise the amount that food stamp recipients get for their daily allowance.  The criticism is at President Bush for wanting to cut 185,000 people out of the food stamp program, and for proposing other cuts.

Just some observations.

I have noticed that there are food stamp users who are very much over weight, and I just wonder how can that be possible?

I have also noticed that food stamp users appear to have cell-phones.

As a volunteer for Habitat for Humanity, building homes in the areas where many food stamp users live, I have noticed satellite disks on the roofs of their homes, as well as many of the occupants of these Habitat homes who are low income families have these disks installed soon after they move in. 


Are cell phones and satellite TV now considered the basic necessities of life more important than food?  How insensitive of me to even think like that.  No, my insensitivity is toward politicians thinking that the government should be the provider of the basic needs of life.  As the basic needs of life is continually expanded each and every year,the government must get bigger and bigger to provide those basic needs.  "A car in every garage", and of course the government will build you a garage if you do not  have one.


Is this more foolishness of politicians to get Americans to cough up additional funds for hand outs?   Another scheme for economic equality, or to be more blunt, socialism?

Google "Food Stamp Challenge" and you'll get over 300 direct references for your reading pleasure.  Now there will be one more.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does the media care about scarring our kids?

No, I don't  think the powers that run the media, those editors who decide what to put on the tube care one bit. or even think that the garbage that is put out over the airwaves is creating a society of scarred little puffballs.  Hollywood often say that they create films that imitate society, and it's values.  I believe that is wrong, that Hollywood is creating societal morals and values.  I also believe that our major news networks, the mainstream media as it is called, is also creating a society where our children are imitating the values and fears broadcast everyday over the airwaves.  It could be different.

Read Peggy Noonans column, it's great, as she is. 


We're Scaring Our Children to Death

Duck-and-cover drills were never this frightening.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The American People"

How do the democrats get off using the phrase "The American People have spoken"?   Hillary uses it continually. 

Obama. "The American people ... are telling me it's time for us to come home."

Edwards. "....restore the trust bond between the American people and the president"

Clinton.  "The American people have spoken. ... Now we can only hope the president will listen,"

Quotes from the warm-up debate of the hopeful 8 Thursday night.   But, where do they get the gaul to use a reference to all Americans support the plan to leave Iraq on a timetable pre-announced to the al-Queada enemy of the west.  No, we all do not support this surrender plan.  I guarantee that in this metropolitan area of 1/2 million, the majority of the people do not support the democratic plan of early withdraw, or the plan of surrender, which would more accurately describe it. 

The president will veto it. 

A little bit of honesty would be a nice touch.  It would be nice to have a few journalists question some of these claims.  But, not with the mainstream old media.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The FCC is after Violent programming

OK folks, the bureaucrats in Washington are at it again, this time after violence programming on TV during prime time, and is now urging lawmakers to consider new rules and regulations to restrict what an impressionable child can have available to watch. The FCC suggests moving the violent programs to later in the evening, or some other regulation.

The program rating system has not worked. The V-chip has not worked. So, there must be a better way to restrict the amount of violence on TV. The FCC wants the authority to define violence, to determine what is and what is not violent and suitable for children to watch. Now, we can all agree that the amount of violence on TV is over the top and is just too much, and also, too unsuspecting in most programs, even those rated PG-13. Whoever came up with that age as the age of maturity. There are some 13 year olds acting like 10 year olds, but if there must be an age, there must be an age. This age group gets free condoms in school, so it must be the right time of life. Anyway, back to the FCC. The article is here in black and white.

Now, I did not read in this article, anything at all about the responsibility of the entertainment industry and perhaps how they could be held accountable for the amount of violence shown on TV. No, not one bit. The FCC could urge Hollywood to be more considerate and film more family friendly programs, without violence and free sex that could and would be broadcast during the prime evening hours. I also did not read anything about the responsibility of the major media broadcast stations and cable stations and their role in controlling the amount of violence broadcast on TV. These organizations seem to be exempt of criticism.

The FCC did state that not enough parents exercised control by using the V-chip to block out the violent programs. That is probably true. But the government wants to “do something”, anything to show that it is doing something to control the amount of violence on TV. And the people appear to want the government to ‘do something’. And then family oriented organizations want the government to ‘do something’. And then the ACLU and other civil rights organizations do not want anything done because of the freedoms of free expressions would be violated by restricting those free expressions we all dislike. And Hollywood agrees. Artists agree. Writers agree. Limiting their freedoms to expose women, show a cut off an arm or leg on CSI, show criminals shooting up innocents or ramming a racing car into another racing car, or a rap star singing about their women hos, or an artist dumping Jesus in urine is all considered free speech, but creating a cartoon about Mohammed is self-censored. But the experts at the FCC can do something. Congress can do something.

Folks, controlling human behavior has been a problem since Adam, or was it before that, before the time that an ape had a series of biological mutations to turn into Adam. There are laws against stealing, but it continues. There are laws against murder, but it continues. At one time, if one murdered, he was murdered for murdering. Then we took away the second murder, and murders continue, except now the murderer can rest his life away locked up. But murders continues anyway.

Parents, do you know what your children are watching? Parents, do you know what your children are listening to? Parents, do you yourself watch violence, but tell your 12 ½ year old she/he has to wait six more months and then can watch it. Parents, be a good parent and sell you TV, read good books, play games, go for walks, or if you’d still like your TV for the travel channel, then take control. But you like sports also. Well, football could be considered as violent by the FCC, as it’s certainly more violent than dodgeball on playgrounds and that was banned because it was too violent. Basketball fans can get violent. Baseball players slamming the bat on the ground could be considered a violent act, and the verbal violence against umpires is not nice. Ice hockey is certainly violent as refs watch players fight it out for 30 seconds.  Golf is not violent, so that’s OK.  So, all you have left is the travel channel and the cooking shows.  The FCC will do something to make it feel better because it did something.


And that's As I See It Now.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The “Great Global Warming Swindle” needs edits, they say.

You always know who ‘they’ are don’t you?  The experts, the scientists, the study groupers, that bunch of watchers, always so very concerned with what everyone can view, can read, can hear, and always mindful of the ‘public interest’.

Now, a group of British scientists are demanding that edits be made to the documentary about global warming, which according to this esteemed bunch, there are grave errors in the program. The film titled “The Great Global Warming Swindle” was aired on British TV in March, and it got some 34 scientists upset that there were some ‘misrepresentations’ in the documentary.

“Bob Ward, the former spokesman for the Royal Society, Britain's academy of science, and one of the letter's signatories, said director Mark Durkin made a "long catalog of fundamental and profound mistakes" -- including the claim that volcanoes produce more carbon dioxide than humans, and that the Earth's atmosphere was warmer during the Middle Ages than it is today.”

So, this group of believers want the misleading and errors removed before it is put on DVD.

But, then the scientists who are not believers, and the director of the film think this is an attempt to gag scientific criticism.

"This is a contemptible, weasel-worded attempt to gag scientific criticism, and it won't work," he said. "I don't believe they're interested in quality control when it comes to the reporting of science -- so long as it's on their side."

Another example of the tactic of gag the opponent who does not agree.  And then the scientists who are demanding the film be changed, use our freedoms of speech as the reason it should be changed. "Free speech does not extend to misleading the public by making factually inaccurate statements," he said. "Somebody has to stand up for the public interest here."

And of course, Mr. Bob Ward stands up to volunteer to be the supreme authority of what is and what isn't.   And that ladies and gentlemen is their kind of 'free speech'.   Hmmmmm.!   
The story from AP.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where is the outrage? Our soldiers are "dogs".

Why are the liberals not expressing their offensiveness at the Members of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for calling our murdered American soldiers "dogs"?   That's not right.  Where is the outrage?

"It was a very happy day for us Palestinians to hear nine American dogs were killed in Iraq. We feel encouraged and we feel great solidarity with our brothers in Iraq, and we consider this heroic operation, which aims to humiliate the Americans, as proof that the will of the our resistance is more powerful than any [big] American war airplanes," Abu Ahmed, the northern Gaza commander of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, said in a WND interview today.

Yes, the guy called our military men and women "dogs".   Where is the mainstream media high lighting this story and the very offensive comments about our soldiers?   Those comments are over the hill, and we should be demanding that they apologize.  Where is the outrage?   will Rosie express her feelings of disgust at American men and women being called "dogs"?  I have not heard one word of protest from Harry Reid, John Murtha, Nancy the fancy or any of the presidential hopefuls protesting these offensive comments.  Even the ACLU has been quiet.  The story did not indicate the race of any of the soldiers, so that's why Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have been quiet.  Waiting to find out.

Oh, the political correct dictionary is being updated as I write this, so just be patient, the word "dog" will soon be added to the list of banned words.  Amazon has returned all the previous editions of the dictionary and ordered the new revised version which, will be available soon. 

Oh what a twisted world of twisted people offering twisted advise in order to make everyone appear twisted.

Some of the definitions of "twisted".

a. To wind together (two or more threads, for example) so as to produce a single strand.
b. To form in this manner: twist a length of rope from strands of hemp.
2. To wind or coil (vines or rope, for example) about something.
3. To interlock or interlace: twist flowers in one's hair.
4. To make (one's way) in a tortuous manner: twisted my way through the briar patch.
5. To turn so as to face another direction: twisted their heads around at the sound of the doorbell.
6. To impart a spiral or coiling shape to, as by turning the ends in opposite directions: twisting wire into a loop.
7.
a. To turn or open by turning: twisted off the bottle cap.
b. To pull, break, or snap by turning: twist off a dead branch.
8. To wrench or sprain: twist one's wrist.
9. To alter the normal aspect of; contort: twist one's mouth into a wry smile.
10. To alter or distort the intended meaning of: The cross-examiner twisted the words of the witness. See Synonyms at distort.
11. To alter or distort the mental, moral, or emotional character of: The trauma twisted the child's outlook.

Take your pick.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Salvation Army sued by EEOC

Every day a new outrageous event happens in our secular progressive liberals gone wild society.  Now get this, the Salvation Army is being sued because they wanted their employees to learn to speak English, gave them a year to do it, to make a decent attempt to communicate in our language, and when they failed the Army then fired the employees.   Well, our bureaucrats in Washington did not like that.   What gives them that authority? 

"The EEOC filed a lawsuit against the Salvation Army claiming the employees had suffered "emotional pain, humiliation, and embarrassment" as a result of the English-only policy."   NewsMax story. 
Hispanic Tips web.

"The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which might easily be called the Department of Political Correctness, has decided to take on the Salvation Army."  

Who could be against the salvation Army?   Here is an organization that only helps people in need, standing in the cold outside stores all during the Christmas season ringing their bells for donations to help others.  Soup kitchens.  Clothing for homeless.  Winter jackets for kids without one.  Aid to natural disaster victims.  Hiring people who others may not.  Just one good deed after another.  Never an activist, just wanting to help anyone in need anytime in whatever way they can.

The salvation Army, a private organization, a charity, a quiet religious group that has been around for over a century. 

Outrageous.   So, those two Hispanic employees did not want to learn English.  Show them the door.
Not long ago a Muslim clerk in a target store did not want to scan a customers bacon because it's a pork product.   Show them the door.   A Muslim middle school student did not like it when another student left a ham sandwich on the table.  Show the Muslim kid the door.  On and on.  Outrageous. 

Outrageous.   Where is all this going?  If Hispanics and Muslims wish to legally come to America and become Americans then welcome.  I refuse to learn another language to prove my feelings about diversity, and I refuse to abide by any Islamic laws to prove my feelings about diversity.  This is America.   A couple of generations ago, the Italians, the Greeks, the Germans, the French, the Swedes, the Norwegians, the Polish, the Dutch, the Swiss, the Asians, and on and on, emigrated legally into these United States and learned to speak English in order to best participate in the better life the freedoms enabled them to do.  Sure there were established motherland neighborhoods and there they spoke their native tongue if they so desired, but when they went to work and did business, English was the accepted and expected language.  Learn it. 

This is something akin to an American couple adopting an older child from Mexico who is already conversant in Spanish, and the Dept of Health and Human Services demands that his new parents to learn Spanish.  Now how ridiculous is that? 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Student leaves a Ham sandwich on a table, gets suspended.

A middle school student gets suspended for leaving a ham sandwich on a table where Muslims students were sitting.  You can't make up a story like this.  It's real folks.  You've heard about how Muslims don't like ham, or anything that comes from a pig, like bacon, ham hocks, pigs feet and ham sandwiches. 

"A middle school student in Lewiston, Maine is being investigated by the police for a possible hate crime after he placed a bag containing a ham sandwich on a table where Somali students eat lunch."    According to Superintendent Levesque, "the school incident is being treated seriously as a hate incident." Police are currently investigating the matter alongside the Center for the Prevention of Hate Violence, who is also working with the school to create an anti-ham "response plan."     The rest of the story.

Coming to your Wal-Mart, or your friendly home town grocery store soon, will be signs and possibly marks on the floor warning Muslims to stay out as this area is a Ham zone.  Or, could politicians think it would be a good idea to have stores build special enclosed off areas for the sale of Ham products, something like smoking sections that used to be in restaurants, or the banning of Hams products altogether, or special stand alone stores that sell ham products.   They will be thinking of things like this soon.  I think I'll hang a ham in the driveway of my home.  Put a picture of a pig on the rear window of my car.  Or, remember the dice that we used to hang from the rear view mirror, now a stuffed little pig would look good.  Oh. Oh, I'm being a bit insensitive.

"We need to take a look at this and review how a careless act is degrading and causes hurt to other people. All our students should feel welcome in our schools, knowing that they are safe from attacks with ham, bacon, porkchops, or any other delicious meat that comes from pigs."

And this kid gets suspended. 

Mommy, they kicked me out of school today.  I wasn't hungry, so I left my sandwich on the table for the other kids if they wanted it. 

You got suspended for that? 

Yea. 

What's this world coming to?  We'll get you in that private school next week, I knew we should have done that, as these government schools have lost their mind.  We'll manage somehow, but we got to get you to a school where you can learn something.

It's Ok,  they are the ones who should be suspended for disrupting our schools. If those Muslims want to come to America, then they should adopt to our ways, and then they will be accepted like everyone else.  We were here first.




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Resolution to impeach Cheney....Karl Rove to be investigated

Dennis Kucinich has thrown his hat in the ring for the democratic nomination for president, so would you possibly think that filing a resolution to Impeach Cheney is a political stunt?    Duh.

"Kucinich introduced three articles of impeachment before giving a press conference on Capitol Hill. He said Cheney fabricated the threat of weapons of mass destruction to justify going to war with Iraq, made up a connection between the Iraqi government and Al Qaeda and that he is threatening war against Iran, which he said violates the Constitution."   CNN reports.

And, of course this will lead to nowhere except to add to the documents filed away for posterity.  He knows it,  we know it, the democrat loyals know it, but the loyals are glad he did it anyway, so Kucinich will run with it as a political stunt beating Hillary and Barrack to the table.


* * * * * *

Karl Rove is the next man on the list to be investigated, so the Office of Special Counsel will launch this high-level investigation.  Why this office and not the Senate Judiciary Committee that investigated Gonzales? 

"Most of the time, an obscure federal investigative unit known as the Office of Special Counsel confines itself to monitoring the activities of relatively low-level government employees, stepping in with reprimands and other routine administrative actions for such offenses as discriminating against military personnel or engaging in prohibited political activities."   LA times.

Could they possibly already know that all they can do is send out a reprimand to Rove for being political in his actions?   Not too bad of an idea, only expand it to include all 535 members of Congress and bureaucrats in all agencies.  Stop the political stuff, and get on with the business of protecting the American public, defending the Constitution, and all actions against the Bill of Rights, and here would be the visible proof:  conducting real open honest debates in the style of Lincoln-Douglas of 1858.

That's too much to ask for.  A righteous government.  A government "of the people, for the people and by the people".  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

“Islam vs the Islamists,”

A special showing has been arranged tomorrow night at the Rayburn House Office building for Representatives and their staffs of this PBS special which is being banned from public showing.  Go on over to the  910 Group and get further information about this documentary, and why it is being banned, and why the Muslims do not want this film shown to a wide American audience.  Then call your rep and ask him/her to view the film.  There's got to be a good reason why Islamics do not want this film shown.  Perhaps it just might shed some needed light on the purposes and tactics of Muslims worldwide, light on the agenda of Muslims worldwide, and a light shining in the darkness of liberal progressive diversity and offensiveness training propaganda. 

910 Group blog.


If Keith Ellison is your representative ask him about this documentary. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Universal Health Care still in crosshairs…..again

Grab your wallet folks if the Democrats grab the White House in 2008, as Hillary Care will be.
"We need a movement," Hillary Clinton declared. "We need people to make this the No. 1 voting issue in the '08 election."

The liberal secular progressive socialist democrats are already working on it through Governors of several States as the expansion of SCHIP spreads in the states. SCHIP stands for State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which has been part of the US Department of Health & Human Services, the benefits of which became available in 1997, is financed by Federal and State, and administered by the states. View the Web site here.

SCHIP is already under-funded, so the solution is to grant more federal funds, expand the coverage so that it will need additional funding so that more families can be covered, rich or poor, privately covered or not, because your just cannot have enough Insurance to cover everything, so more funds are needed to expand the coverage so that everyone is covered to the hilt. Is that the way Federal programs expand to the extreme hilt? Read the article at WSJ featured opinion page today. Socialized Medicine by any other name is still socialized medicine.

I just happen to have a question. I get that way. To drive a car we are required to have insurance. Right? OK, so what does that have to do with a completely different issue, that of medical coverage? We all get sick at times. There are accidents. We eat too much and get health issues. We participate in harmful activities. Children need vaccinations. Mothers get pregnant, again. Husbands get sick. Diseases strike unsuspectingly. So why not a Universal Health Care program, what could be wrong with that?

OK. We all need to drive a car at most times of our lives, and accidents happen, the car gets totaled, the passengers get hurt or killed, children get badly hurt or paralyzed, or it’s just a minor paint scrape in the mall parking lot. But the government has not mandated a one for all socialized vehicle insurance program, and why not? What’s the difference?

In auto insurance, we can pick the type of coverage we want, the bare basic liability, or a comprehensive low deductible plan, or one of all kinds between. It’s been our choice. Health insurance has also been our choice, to buy or not to buy. But most workers have health insurance coverage through the employer-negotiated plan, but the choices of coverage have been left to the employer and the insurance company. You either pay in your premiums to join or opt out, and then you’re on your own. But that’s not fair, the big government people say, as many people do not work for a company with such a plan, but health insurance is still available through private insurance companies. But it’s more expensive and the poor cannot afford the private plans. Can the poor afford auto insurance? If the poor try to get away without insurance and total the car, where is the big outcry of it not being fair, of not having the funds to fix the car, of going without until. Where is that outrage? It shall come.

Anyway, enough of my rants on this subject as I’m sure you get the gist of my rant. Health Insurance has become a “right,” but auto insurance is not. Hmmmmmm! The ideas in the minds of socialists are working overtime. Another “right” will be born soon. But first Universal heath Care for all. Will illegal aliens be included?

There is an alternative folks. Look up S.1019 at Thomas (library of congress) introduced by Senator Tom Coburn on 3/28/2007.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Border Patrol Agent is going down.

Yesterday, The top leaders of the Border Patrol Council endorsed a no-confidence resolution against Chief David V. Aguilar.  The union, which represents 11,000 of the U.S. Border Patrol's nonsupervisory field agents, pointed to Aguilar's willingness to believe the "perjured allegations" of criminal aliens over his own agents, in a statement issued today,  WND

Also yesterday, a border Patrol Agent was charged with the murder of an alien Mexican trying to cross into the US illegally, after the Mexican government condemned the act.   The prosecutor , again is relying on the testimony of three relatives of the slain alien, who were attempting to cross over at the same time.  Over 300 pages of testimony  and stated facts have already been collected in the investigation of the slaying, which happened in January. 

"In the days after the shooting, the Border Patrol said that a scuffle had led to it and that the agent had "feared for his life."    But three witnesses who were being apprehended along with Dominguez-Rivera _ his two brothers and a sister-in-law _ told investigators Corbett fired while pushing Dominguez-Rivera to the ground.   Wash. Post article


Could there really be a concerted effort on the part of Anguilar to disregard the testimony of his own Border Patrol Agents in favor of appeasing the Mexican government?    In the case of Ramos and Compean, both of whom are now in jail for a decade, and in the case of Gilmer Hermandez, also convicted for violating the civil rights of an illegal alien, is also in jail, have one commonality.  In both cases, the Mexican consulate expressed their displeasure that our Border Patrol Agents were not being convicted and punished for harming a Mexican. 
In both cases, the American prosecutors used the testimony of Mexican illegal alien criminals to convict the agents.   In both cases the Mexican witnesses were granted immunity for testifying. 

Could Anguilar be on a mission?  Who is Anguilar responsible to?

Now, granted all of the facts in this new case were not released in the Washington Post story, but the similarities are significant for a reasonable person to be suspect of a hidden agenda.    I think I might be reasonable. 

 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive